Crime or punishment ...... Igor Borisovich Naumenko
02.02.2018

Crime or Punishment ......

Igor Borisovich Naumenko

The case aroused a resonance not only among the public, but also among the highest political of the power of Ukraine. All of you, was see the statement of our current Attorney General of Ukraine Yuriy Lutsenko. As the chief prosecutor says, in the city of Nikolaev there will not be "Nauma" and "Multika", see the video by the link-www.youtube.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edoWWEPx5Fc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edoWWEPx5Fc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfTkvQ7V7b4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfTkvQ7V7b4

If you look from the outside, it is the struggle of the SBU, the GPU, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine with the personal participation of the President of Ukraine, against the common man. It is indicative for the current governor of the Nikolayev region Alexei Savchenko. In the intensified struggle between the parties of the BCP and the People's Front, the Nauma case wants to show that Alexei Savchenko, who has actively lobbied and continues to lobby this case, is able to adequately replace Arsen Avakov, who does not currently have a real authoritative replacement in the BPP team. The case of Naum and other Nikolaev affairs (the deputy taken on a bribe, opt, perhaps a cartoon) want to make an irreconcilable image of the current governor, as an implacable fighter in the name of the law at any cost. I will not go into details, but during the Revolution of Dignity Igor Borisovich is one of those people who did not give the city of Nikolaev for the formation of the Nikolaev People's Republic. There are a number of facts and evidence. He as a patron helps ordinary people, plays football in a football club. Naumenko rendered and provides all possible assistance to ATU soldiers, helps orphanages. And then from where do not take the extortion of 30 thousand hryvnia from some Andrei Savov, who concluded a deal with the prosecutor's office during the sentence under art. 368 part 3 (receiving a bribe). The deal involves cooperation with authorities. And now, the accusation for Igor Naumenko is ready. Did not bother even to competently dodge. Without any evidence, the court keeps people in custody for more than a month. While Savov himself was in court, he did not confirm Naumenko's participation in the negotiations on the return of debts to his employers, who paid Savovov's legal defense in debt and tried to repay this debt. Since during the court sessions the prosecutor's office did not once attach Naumenko's wiretapping to anything unrelated to the case, but the main thing was that Naumenko had been listened to many months before the alleged incident without the court's permission, as required by Ukrainian legislation. The prosecutor's office of the Mykolayiv region, under the direction of the General Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine, headed by a member of the BPP team (Yuri Lutsenko), with the active support of the Governor of the Mykolayiv region Alexei Savchenko (also a member of the BCP), try to stipulate honest and decent people, keep them under investigation in the pre-trial detention center of the city of Nikolaev. I want to ask a question, but why did you and I fight, two Orange revolutions and Virtues? Yes, all the same, for the oligarchs to pull the strings of the staff of the apparatus, and they in turn carry out orders, I'll even say so, executed "the orders of the leadership" inviolably and unconditionally. You can clearly see how after six months Igor Naumenko, Igor Uvarov and Grudsky Evgeny begin to lose heart, and they can break down morally, and as you know, respectable readers can break a person, you need to know the approach, and time takes its toll. We fought with you and conducted two revolutions not for the fact that evidence from Denis Petrovich Stoyanov appeared after a while and Judge Nikitin played in the phone when he listened to the criminal case. In fact, as my very good familiar government says, this is the power, the main thing is to use it correctly. The founder of democracy in the world is likely to turn into a coffin, seeing and hearing what is happening with me, my dear readers in his hometown heroes Nikolayev. How can you blame a person and his family, acquaintances, without having any evidence. And if we accuse Naumenko Igor Borisovich of organizing the criminal environment in the city of Nikolaev, extorting 30,000 hryvnia, which is 100 times less than he sent to ATU during the last years of the war, then our common acquaintance of the General Prosecutor of Ukraine can also be accused of something similar, because Dear Lutsenko Yuri, also attracted and was under investigation, under the previous authorities. This once again shows us that "Naum" is a purely political "Zakazuha". Information that is not backed by any facts will remain just the opinion of one or another Prosecutor, But information that is backed up by facts and documents will be evidence in court. All meetings in the Zavodsky district court of the city of Mykolayiv are open to anyone who is interested in judging the semi-reformed Ukrainian Themis in the form of Nikitin Dmitriy, led by the GPU in the form of Denis Petrovich Nikolaev, the representative of the prosecutor's office of Nikolaev, who ensures the detention of Naumenko, has already received the title " Honored Lawyer of Ukraine " Dear ladies and gentlemen, there are a number of facts and evidence that clearly and clearly show to us that the case of Igor Naumenko, Igor Uvarov and Yevgeny Grudsky can be smoothly renamed from the case of extortion, into a political matter. The lawyers of all three defendants who declare the inadmissibility of evidence rely on the CPC articles, the prosecutor, in turn, finds out and annuls the statements of the defense, solely orally, without backing up his words either with the CCP articles or with any documents. Judge Nikitin Dmitry Gennadievich, in spite of the illegitimacy and inadmissibility of the so-called evidence, brings them to the point. The most interesting thing about what periodically comes the conversation in court is that Naumenko is accused for actions that are not stipulated by the article of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, on which the prosecutor constantly relies, indicating the gravity of the charge. That sounds, in general as nonsense. How can you accuse a person of a criminal offense that is not provided for in the criminal code of Ukraine? The prosecution's accusation is generally based on the prosecutor's testimony, because when the victim was questioned by the same Savov, he did not confirm the prosecutor's allegation of extortion

Photo taken from the website No crime

No crime .

Menu
Log in

Menu

Forum guide

Soc. networks

Log in
E-mail
Password
E-mail
You will get the instruction for the password recovery in 5 minutes to you email.
Registration
Login
E-mail
Password
Log in through
Feedback form
E-mail
Message
Add topic
RU EN
You can load next formats: jpg, png, bmp, pdf, gif, docx, xlsx, pptx, zip, rar.
Size can`t be more than 100 Мb